The Times Australia
The Times News

.

With billions more allocated to immigration detention, it's another bleak year for refugees

  • Written by Claire Higgins, Senior Research Fellow, Kaldor Centre for International Refugee Law, UNSW

Refugees and asylum seekers will take little comfort from the 2021–22 budget. Resettlement places remain capped, while spending on offshore processing, immigration detention and deterrence measures remains high.

For those still held offshore in Papua New Guinea or Nauru, in detention here in Australia, or on temporary[1] visas in our community, the budget compounds the human cost of Australia’s hardline asylum policy.

Cap remains the same on refugee placements

Before COVID-19, Australia’s humanitarian program provided for the resettlement of up to 18,750 refugees and others in need each year. The program fell short[2] of this number early last year when international travel was restricted due to the COVID-19 outbreak.

It was then cut by 5,000 places for 2020, and these places have not been restored[3] under the latest budget.

This is despite calls[4] from advocacy groups for Australia to do more in response to global displacement — particularly with the pressures[5] COVID has placed on countries hosting large numbers of forced migrants — and to restore the humanitarian program to its pre-pandemic level.

Read more: With our borders shut, this is the ideal time to overhaul our asylum seeker policies[6]

Little help for those in Nauru or PNG

Offshore processing is once again a big budget item for Home Affairs, set at close to A$812 million[7] for 2021-22.

With 109 people currently being held on Nauru and 130 in Papua New Guinea[8], this equates to almost $3.4 million[9] per person for 2021.

For the next three years (2022–24), spending on offshore processing is projected at just over $300 million annually, although experience shows annual costs have exceeded those provided in the forward estimates since at least 2015[10].

This excessive spending raises serious questions about the government’s planning for these refugees stuck in limbo.

Keeping people in Nauru and PNG cannot be the only option, and the UN refugee agency has long made clear[11] Australia must “live up to its responsibilities” to find long-term and humane solutions for those held offshore.

The budget includes continued support for Nauru and PNG to provide “durable migration options” in the way of resettlement, voluntarily return to individuals’ home countries or removal for those found not to be refugees.

But in addition to Australia’s obligations[12] on this front, experts have raised real concerns[13] that some asylum seekers have been pressured to agree to return home, despite the risks this may pose to their safety.

Among those still held offshore, only a small[14] number have received provisional approval as of March for resettlement in the United States. The UN refugee agency, meanwhile, is working[15] to find resettlement places in Canada and Europe, without help from Australia.

With billions more allocated to immigration detention, it's another bleak year for refugees Some refugees have been waiting upwards of eight years for their claims to be asylum cases to be decided. BIANCA DE MARCHI/AAP

Vast sums for detention

The budget also sees big spending on immigration detention, with more than $1.2 billion[16] allocated to Home Affairs for onshore detention and compliance in 2021-22. This includes packages to assist individuals to voluntarily return to their countries of origin.

An extra $464.7 million[17] has also been allocated to increase capacity in detention centres on the Australian mainland and on Christmas Island, due to the challenges[18] of deporting people during COVID-19 travel restrictions.

The Christmas Island facility was “reactivated” under last year’s budget to the tune of $55.6m[19], and currently holds more than 200[20] people.

The Murugappan[21] family from Biloela, Queensland, lives in a separate[22] section of the facility. They have been detained there since August 2019 — and for a long time they were the only occupants — at a substantial cost[23].

Farther afield, Home Affairs will spend $104 million to continue working with regional governments and international organisations (such as the International Organisation for Migration) as part of ongoing efforts to prevent human trafficking and people smuggling.

And an additional $38.1 million[24] is going to Indonesia to continue funding basic services for asylum seekers and information campaigns designed to deter people from seeking asylum in Australia.

Read more: For Muslim refugees in immigration detention, another sombre, isolated Eid holiday[25]

Mixed support for asylum seekers in the community

There are thousands of asylum seekers in Australia still waiting[26] for their claims for protection to be assessed.

The Department of Home Affairs has recently launched a “blitz[27]” in calling people in for their first interviews, which refugee lawyers[28] say has left some applicants with just two weeks to prepare.

Perhaps unsurprisingly, the budget continues a downward trend[29] in the amount of funding for support services for asylum seekers at just $33 million[30] for 2021–22, down from $39 million two years ago.

Advocates say[31] this funding will only cover “a tiny percentage” of the needs of asylum seekers in the community while their protection claims are being assessed.

Elsewhere, however, the budget did hit some positive notes for refugees in the measures aimed at improving women’s safety.

Alongside economic and social support initiatives for refugee and migrant women, there is a pilot program[32] to enable women on temporary visas who are experiencing family violence to explore visa options not reliant on their partner.

Read more: Scores of medevac refugees have been released from detention. Their freedom, though, remains tenuous[33]

A missed opportunity

With Australia’s borders predicted to remain closed until mid-2022, the needs of refugees and asylum seekers may not be grabbing headlines in this budget cycle.

But as the Refugee Council of Australia has recently documented[34], there are many ways[35] the government can help displaced people during the pandemic.

This includes bringing people from Nauru and PNG to Australia and ensuring procedural fairness in the assessment of their protection claims.

With studies[36] repeatedly showing the settlement of displaced people can help to address demographic and labour shortages and substantially boost Australia’s economy, this budget’s emphasis on detention, deterrence and removal is disappointing.

It’s a missed opportunity for refugees and for the nation’s post-pandemic future.

References

  1. ^ temporary (temporary.kaldorcentre.net)
  2. ^ fell short (www.refugeecouncil.org.au)
  3. ^ have not been restored (amp.sbs.com.au)
  4. ^ calls (www.amnesty.org.au)
  5. ^ pressures (www.thenewhumanitarian.org)
  6. ^ With our borders shut, this is the ideal time to overhaul our asylum seeker policies (theconversation.com)
  7. ^ A$812 million (www.homeaffairs.gov.au)
  8. ^ 109 people currently being held on Nauru and 130 in Papua New Guinea (www.refugeecouncil.org.au)
  9. ^ $3.4 million (www.theguardian.com)
  10. ^ 2015 (www.kaldorcentre.unsw.edu.au)
  11. ^ clear (www.unhcr.org)
  12. ^ obligations (www.kaldorcentre.unsw.edu.au)
  13. ^ concerns (www.refugeecouncil.org.au)
  14. ^ small (parlinfo.aph.gov.au)
  15. ^ working (www.theguardian.com)
  16. ^ $1.2 billion (www.homeaffairs.gov.au)
  17. ^ $464.7 million (minister.homeaffairs.gov.au)
  18. ^ challenges (parlinfo.aph.gov.au)
  19. ^ $55.6m (www.kaldorcentre.unsw.edu.au)
  20. ^ 200 (parlinfo.aph.gov.au)
  21. ^ Murugappan (theconversation.com)
  22. ^ separate (www.refugeecouncil.org.au)
  23. ^ substantial cost (www.theguardian.com)
  24. ^ $38.1 million (www.homeaffairs.gov.au)
  25. ^ For Muslim refugees in immigration detention, another sombre, isolated Eid holiday (theconversation.com)
  26. ^ waiting (temporary.kaldorcentre.net)
  27. ^ blitz (www.racs.org.au)
  28. ^ refugee lawyers (www.racs.org.au)
  29. ^ trend (www.refugeecouncil.org.au)
  30. ^ $33 million (www.dss.gov.au)
  31. ^ say (asrc.org.au)
  32. ^ pilot program (budget.gov.au)
  33. ^ Scores of medevac refugees have been released from detention. Their freedom, though, remains tenuous (theconversation.com)
  34. ^ documented (www.refugeecouncil.org.au)
  35. ^ many ways (www.refugeecouncil.org.au)
  36. ^ studies (www.kaldorcentre.unsw.edu.au)

Read more https://theconversation.com/with-billions-more-allocated-to-immigration-detention-its-another-bleak-year-for-refugees-160783

Times Magazine

Building a Strong Online Presence with Katoomba Web Design

Katoomba web design is more than just creating a website that looks good—it’s about building an online presence that reflects your brand, engages your audience, and drives results. For local businesses in the Blue Mountains, a well-designed website a...

September Sunset Polo

International Polo Tour To Bridge Historic Sport, Life-Changing Philanthropy, and Breath-Taking Beauty On Saturday, September 6th, history will be made as the International Polo Tour (IPT), a sports leader headquartered here in South Florida...

5 Ways Microsoft Fabric Simplifies Your Data Analytics Workflow

In today's data-driven world, businesses are constantly seeking ways to streamline their data analytics processes. The sheer volume and complexity of data can be overwhelming, often leading to bottlenecks and inefficiencies. Enter the innovative da...

7 Questions to Ask Before You Sign IT Support Companies in Sydney

Choosing an IT partner can feel like buying an insurance policy you hope you never need. The right choice keeps your team productive, your data safe, and your budget predictable. The wrong choice shows up as slow tickets, surprise bills, and risky sh...

Choosing the Right Legal Aid Lawyer in Sutherland Shire: Key Considerations

Legal aid services play an essential role in ensuring access to justice for all. For people in the Sutherland Shire who may not have the financial means to pay for private legal assistance, legal aid ensures that everyone has access to representa...

Watercolor vs. Oil vs. Digital: Which Medium Fits Your Pet's Personality?

When it comes to immortalizing your pet’s unique personality in art, choosing the right medium is essential. Each artistic medium, whether watercolor, oil, or digital, has distinct qualities that can bring out the spirit of your furry friend in dif...

The Times Features

How much money do you need to be happy? Here’s what the research says

Over the next decade, Elon Musk could become the world’s first trillionaire[1]. The Tesla board recently proposed a US$1 trillion (A$1.5 trillion) compensation plan, if Musk ca...

NSW has a new fashion sector strategy – but a sustainable industry needs a federally legislated response

The New South Wales government recently announced the launch of the NSW Fashion Sector Strategy, 2025–28[1]. The strategy, developed in partnership with the Australian Fashion ...

From Garden to Gift: Why Roses Make the Perfect Present

Think back to the last time you gave or received flowers. Chances are, roses were part of the bunch, or maybe they were the whole bunch.   Roses tend to leave an impression. Even ...

Do I have insomnia? 5 reasons why you might not

Even a single night of sleep trouble can feel distressing and lonely. You toss and turn, stare at the ceiling, and wonder how you’ll cope tomorrow. No wonder many people star...

Wedding Photography Trends You Need to Know (Before You Regret Your Album)

Your wedding album should be a timeless keepsake, not something you cringe at years later. Trends may come and go, but choosing the right wedding photography approach ensures your ...

Can you say no to your doctor using an AI scribe?

Doctors’ offices were once private. But increasingly, artificial intelligence (AI) scribes (also known as digital scribes) are listening in. These tools can record and trans...