The Times Australia
Google AI
The Times World News

.

Pew's new global survey of climate change attitudes finds promising trends but deep divides

  • Written by Kate T. Luong, Postdoctoral Research Fellow, George Mason University

People’s views about climate change, from how worried they are about it affecting them to how willing they are to do something about it, have shifted in developed countries around the world in recent years, a new survey by the Pew Research Center[1] finds.

The study polled more than 16,000 adults[2] in 17 countries considered to be advanced economies. Many of these countries have been large contributors to climate change and will be expected to lead the way in fixing it.

In general, the survey found that a majority of people are concerned about global climate change and are willing to make lifestyle changes to reduce its effects.

However, underneath this broad pattern lie more complicated trends, such as doubt that the international community can effectively reduce climate change and deep ideological divides that can hinder the transition to cleaner energy and a climate-friendly world. The survey also reveals an important disconnect between people’s attitudes and the enormity of the challenge climate change poses.

Here’s what stood out to us as professionals[3] who study the public’s response[4] to climate change[5].

Strong concern and willingness to take action

In all the countries surveyed in early 2021 except Sweden, between 60% and 90% of the citizens reported feeling somewhat or very concerned about the harm they would personally face from climate change. While there was a clear increase in concern in several countries between 2015, when Pew conducted the same survey, and 2021, this number did not change significantly in the U.S.

Pew's new global survey of climate change attitudes finds promising trends but deep divides CC BY-ND[6] Similarly, in all countries except Japan, at least 7 out of 10 people said they are willing to make some or a lot of changes in how they live and work to help address global climate change. Across most countries, young people were much more likely than older generations to report higher levels of both concern about climate change and willingness to change their behaviors. Perceptions about government responses Clearly, on a global level, people are highly concerned about this existential threat and are willing to change their everyday behaviors to mitigate its impacts. However, focusing on changing individual behaviors alone will not stop global warming. In the U.S., for example, about 74% of greenhouse gas emissions are from fossil fuel combustion[7]. People can switch to driving electric vehicles or taking electric buses and trains, but those still need power. To pressure utilities to shift to renewable energy requires policy-level changes, both domestically and internationally[8]. When we look at people’s attitudes regarding how their own country is handling climate change and how effective international actions would be, the results painted a more complex picture. On average, most people evaluated their own government’s handling of climate change as “somewhat good,” with the highest approval numbers in Sweden, the United Kingdom, Singapore and New Zealand. However, data shows that such positive evaluations are not actually warranted. The 2020 U.N. Emissions Gap Report[9] found that greenhouse gas emissions have continued to rise. Many countries, including the U.S., are projected to miss their target commitments to reduce emissions by 2030; and even if all countries achieve their targets, annual emissions need to be reduced much further to reach the goals set by the Paris climate agreement. When it comes to confidence in international actions to address climate change, the survey respondents were more skeptical overall. Although the majority of people in Germany, the Netherlands, South Korea and Singapore felt confident that the international community can significantly reduce climate change, most respondents in the rest of the countries surveyed did not. France and Sweden had the lowest levels of confidence with more than 6 in 10 people being unconvinced. Together, these results suggest that people generally believe climate change to be a problem that can be solved by individual people and governments. Most people say they are willing to change their lifestyles, but they may not have an accurate perception of the scale of actions needed to effectively address global climate change. Overall, people may be overly optimistic about their own country’s capability and commitment to reduce emissions and fight climate change, and at the same time, underestimate the value and effectiveness of international actions. These perceptions may reflect the fact that the conversation surrounding climate change[10] so far has been dominated by calls to change individual behaviors instead of emphasizing the necessity of collective and policy-level actions. Addressing these gaps is an important goal for people who are working in climate communication[11] and trying to increase public support for stronger domestic policies and international collaborations. Deep ideological divide in climate attitudes As with most surveys about climate change attitudes, the new Pew report reveals a deep ideological divide in several countries. [Over 100,000 readers rely on The Conversation’s newsletter to understand the world. Sign up today[12].] Perhaps not surprisingly, the U.S. leads in ideological differences for all but one question. In the U.S., 87% of liberals are somewhat or very concerned about the personal harms from climate change, compared to only 28% of conservatives – a stark 59-point difference. This difference persists for willingness to change one’s lifestyle (49-point difference), evaluation of government’s handling of climate change (41-point difference), and perceived economic impacts of international actions (41-point difference). And the U.S. is not alone; large ideological differences were also found in Canada, Australia and the Netherlands. In fact, only Australians were more divided than Americans on how their government is handling the climate crisis. This ideological divide is not new, but the size of the gap between people on the two ends of the ideological spectrum is astounding. The differences lie not only in how to handle the issue or who should be responsible but also in the scope and severity of climate change in the first place. Such massive, entrenched differences in public understanding and acceptance of the scientific facts regarding climate change will present significant challenges in enacting much-needed policy changes. Better understanding of the cultural, political and media dynamics that shape those differences might reveal helpful insights that could ease the path toward progress in slowing climate change.

Read more https://theconversation.com/pews-new-global-survey-of-climate-change-attitudes-finds-promising-trends-but-deep-divides-167847

Times Magazine

Epson launches ELPCS01 mobile projector cart

Designed for the EB-810E[1] projector and provides easy setup for portable displays in flexible ...

Governance Models for Headless CMS in Large Organizations

Where headless CMS is adopted by large enterprises, governance is the single most crucial factor d...

Narwal Freo Z10 Robotic Vacuum and Mop Cleaner

Narwal Freo Z10 Robotic Vacuum and Mop Cleaner  Rating: ★★★★☆ (4.4/5) Category: Premium Robot ...

Shark launches SteamSpot - the shortcut for everyday floor mess

Shark introduces the Shark SteamSpot Steam Mop, a lightweight steam mop designed to make everyda...

Game Together, Stay Together: Logitech G Reveals Gaming Couples Enjoy Higher Relationship Satisfaction

With Valentine’s Day right around the corner, many lovebirds across Australia are planning for the m...

AI threatens to eat business software – and it could change the way we work

In recent weeks, a range of large “software-as-a-service” companies, including Salesforce[1], Se...

The Times Features

Tasmania in 2026: Opportunity, Pressure and the Island State’s Defining Moment

Tasmania has long held a unique place in the Australian story. It is a state known for natural b...

Middle East war set to push inflation higher than forecast, warns RBA deputy governor

The Reserve Bank’s Deputy Governor Andrew Hauser says inflation in Australia looks likely to be ...

Leader of The Nationals David Littleproud to resign

Statement by David Littleproud  10 March 2026 - This afternoon I notified The Nationals Chief W...

How Modern Specialist Accommodation is Redefining Accessible Living

For decades, the concept of accessible housing was synonymous with clinical functionality. The foc...

Insolvencies have spiked – would a law change let more businesses trade their way out of trouble?

New Zealand has been experiencing a striking rise in company failures, focusing attention on t...

The New Inheritance Problem Costing Australian Families Their Wealth

Australians are sleepwalking into a digital inheritance crisis by failing to include provisions fo...

Resmed’s Global Sleep Survey Reveals Sleep is One of the Top Health Priorities, but Quality Rest Remains Out of Reach

Insights from 30,000 people across 13 countries, including Australia, show global sleep health aware...

Seeing the same midwife or doctor in pregnancy and labour reduces the risk of birth trauma

Every pregnant woman wants to deliver a healthy baby. During labour and birth, women also want...

Cobram Estate | Heart Health Month Backed By Science

A dedicated time to elevate awareness of cardiovascular wellbeing and support healthier lifestyles...