The Times Australia
The Times World News

.

Film camera departments operate on a system of who you know, so what happens when you're not a member of the in-group?

  • Written by Bronwyn Coate, Senior Lecturer in Economics, RMIT University
Film camera departments operate on a system of who you know, so what happens when you're not a member of the in-group?

Concerns about power imbalances and toxic working environments in the film and TV industries long pre-date[1] the emergence of #metoo as a global rallying cry against sexual assault and harassment on set.

Well-intentioned policymakers have made many attempts to intervene over the past 50 years or so[2], focusing primarily on addressing gender imbalances using a “just add women and stir” approach.

In Australia this is exemplified by the Gender Matters[3] policy suite from Screen Australia, which aims to improve the number of women working behind the scenes, and the number of productions telling women’s stories.

Yet while gender inequality is important, it certainly is not all that matters if the ultimate goal is a safe, equitable and inclusive workplace. Instead, we need to take a detailed view of who works in the Australian film industry, and understand the specific challenges they face.

Read more: Screen Australia celebrates its work in gender equality but things are far from equal[4]

Building a camera department

Our recently published research[5] finds inequitable power dynamics behind the camera on Australian film sets are pernicious and persistent.

Purely in terms of gender discrimination, this industry is a shocker.

Camera departments are highly skewed to male employment. The camera department is headed by a director of photography (DOP or cinematographer), and is made up of a variety of positions including camera operators, camera assistants, gaffers and grips.

An industry snapshot[6] in 2021 reported a mere 4% of Australian films employed a woman as the DOP. The percentage of women working as cinematographers in the top 250 Hollywood movies only increased[7] from 4% in 1998 to 6% in 2021.

Of cinematographers working in Europe between 2017 and 2021, 10% were women[8].

A busy film set.
Most people employed in camera departments are men. Shutterstock

Our study draws on the survey data collected from 582 people included in the Wider Lens Report[9] commissioned by the Australian Cinematographers Society.

Under 2% of respondents who had worked exclusively as the director of photography in the 12 months prior to COVID were women. This percentage lifts slightly to the 4% observed in other industry data when we account for women who worked across multiple camera department roles including director of photography. This discrepancy reveals how women DOPs are more likely than men to work across other (less prestigious) camera department roles.

Beyond focusing on the headline gender statistics, we also wanted to interrogate an intersectional[10] view of discrimination inside camera crews, considering how factors such as racism, sexism, ageism, ableism and homophobia can also impact employment opportunity and experience.

Read more: Explainer: what does 'intersectionality' mean?[11]

What does a cinematographer look like?

Looking at the survey data, we identified four main cohorts in Australian camera departments.

Not surprisingly, the dominant and most successful in-group was Anglo-Celtic heterosexual men (37% of the total sample).

Another cohort, sharing some of the same features, is made up of heterosexual men from non-Anglo-Celtic ethnicities (34.5%).

There are also two clear, much smaller “out-groups” comprising of heterosexual women (11.5%) and a significant cohort of sexuality and gender minorities (13.5%) including lesbians, gay men, bisexuals, queer men and women, and gender non-binary people.

(A small percentage of people were not able to be assigned to any of these groupings because of missing information.)

Workplace power

Cis-heterosexual men are paid more and occupy higher status roles than women and other groups. Experiences of discrimination and harassment tend to be found in the two “out-groups” and, to a lesser extent, among men from underrepresented ethnicities.

We found 88% of heterosexual women reported experiencing sexism, and 39% of respondents from the sexuality and gender minorities group reported experiencing homophobia.

A woman behind a camera. 88% of heterosexual women working in camera departments reported experiencing sexism. Shutterstock

Interestingly, nearly 20% of heterosexual men also claimed to have experienced sexism. From looking at qualitative responses, we found these experiences were linked to respondents’ perceptions that diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives generated disadvantage for straight men.

Experiences of ageism tended to be less concentrated in any one group, although there was one interesting distinction.

In the sexuality and gender minorities group, ageism was more likely to manifest around perceptions of being “too young” and “inexperienced”. For the other groups, ageism was more likely to be linked to the perception of being “too old”.

Experiences of ableism were highest for the sexuality and gender minorities group, with most reported discrimination related specifically to perceptions of mental illness.

Camera departments operate so that “who you know” and being able to “fit in” matter. Those who are not men, not White and not heteronormative often felt they were discriminated against.

Read more: ‘The number one barrier has probably been stigma’: the challenges facing disabled workers in the Australian screen industry[12]

Rethinking the industry

It doesn’t have to be this way. In-group dominance does not require hostility and discrimination against out-group members.

Current piecemeal policy responses won’t be enough to overhaul the entrenched systems and cultures that perpetuate toxic workplaces and social inequalities in the screen industries.

Typical policies focus on the idea that individuals from under-represented groups can succeed if they get more training or personal skills development[13].

Instead, we argue, strategies for change need to be targeted at multiple levels, and need to include wholesale reform.

This means rethinking how the agencies and guilds that endorse the industry define its values, how the business and operational layers of the film industry work to reinforce discrimination, and how such inequitable production teams are brought together.

A toxic system is supported by many individual ethical decisions. Some are acts of cowardice or fear. Some are actually bad actions that hurt people.

Some, in defiance of their context, are acts of grace and courage.

On the set and in the boardrooms where decisions are made, screen industry workplaces need to be regulated to ensure zero tolerance for toxic behaviours and structural discrimination. Where there are no real consequences for bad actions, bad actors prosper.

Anything less would be tinkering at the edges of a foundational problem.

Read more: Tony Burke's double ministry of arts and industrial relations could be just what the arts sector needs[14]

References

  1. ^ long pre-date (quod.lib.umich.edu)
  2. ^ past 50 years or so (journals.sagepub.com)
  3. ^ Gender Matters (www.screenaustralia.gov.au)
  4. ^ Screen Australia celebrates its work in gender equality but things are far from equal (theconversation.com)
  5. ^ Our recently published research (journals.sagepub.com)
  6. ^ industry snapshot (www.screenaustralia.gov.au)
  7. ^ only increased (womenintvfilm.sdsu.edu)
  8. ^ 10% were women (rm.coe.int)
  9. ^ Wider Lens Report (cinematographer.org.au)
  10. ^ intersectional (theconversation.com)
  11. ^ Explainer: what does 'intersectionality' mean? (theconversation.com)
  12. ^ ‘The number one barrier has probably been stigma’: the challenges facing disabled workers in the Australian screen industry (theconversation.com)
  13. ^ personal skills development (screenworks.com.au)
  14. ^ Tony Burke's double ministry of arts and industrial relations could be just what the arts sector needs (theconversation.com)

Read more https://theconversation.com/film-camera-departments-operate-on-a-system-of-who-you-know-so-what-happens-when-youre-not-a-member-of-the-in-group-209786

Times Magazine

Headless CMS in Digital Twins and 3D Product Experiences

Image by freepik As the metaverse becomes more advanced and accessible, it's clear that multiple sectors will use digital twins and 3D product experiences to visualize, connect, and streamline efforts better. A digital twin is a virtual replica of ...

The Decline of Hyper-Casual: How Mid-Core Mobile Games Took Over in 2025

In recent years, the mobile gaming landscape has undergone a significant transformation, with mid-core mobile games emerging as the dominant force in app stores by 2025. This shift is underpinned by changing user habits and evolving monetization tr...

Understanding ITIL 4 and PRINCE2 Project Management Synergy

Key Highlights ITIL 4 focuses on IT service management, emphasising continual improvement and value creation through modern digital transformation approaches. PRINCE2 project management supports systematic planning and execution of projects wit...

What AI Adoption Means for the Future of Workplace Risk Management

Image by freepik As industrial operations become more complex and fast-paced, the risks faced by workers and employers alike continue to grow. Traditional safety models—reliant on manual oversight, reactive investigations, and standardised checklist...

From Beach Bops to Alpine Anthems: Your Sonos Survival Guide for a Long Weekend Escape

Alright, fellow adventurers and relaxation enthusiasts! So, you've packed your bags, charged your devices, and mentally prepared for that glorious King's Birthday long weekend. But hold on, are you really ready? Because a true long weekend warrior kn...

Effective Commercial Pest Control Solutions for a Safer Workplace

Keeping a workplace clean, safe, and free from pests is essential for maintaining productivity, protecting employee health, and upholding a company's reputation. Pests pose health risks, can cause structural damage, and can lead to serious legal an...

The Times Features

Duke of Dural to Get Rooftop Bar as New Owners Invest in Venue Upgrade

The Duke of Dural, in Sydney’s north-west, is set for a major uplift under new ownership, following its acquisition by hospitality group Good Beer Company this week. Led by resp...

Prefab’s Second Life: Why Australia’s Backyard Boom Needs a Circular Makeover

The humble granny flat is being reimagined not just as a fix for housing shortages, but as a cornerstone of circular, factory-built architecture. But are our systems ready to s...

Melbourne’s Burglary Boom: Break-Ins Surge Nearly 25%

Victorian homeowners are being warned to act now, as rising break-ins and falling arrest rates paint a worrying picture for suburban safety. Melbourne residents are facing an ...

Exploring the Curriculum at a Modern Junior School in Melbourne

Key Highlights The curriculum at junior schools emphasises whole-person development, catering to children’s physical, emotional, and intellectual needs. It ensures early year...

Distressed by all the bad news? Here’s how to stay informed but still look after yourself

If you’re feeling like the news is particularly bad at the moment, you’re not alone. But many of us can’t look away – and don’t want to. Engaging with news can help us make ...

The Role of Your GP in Creating a Chronic Disease Management Plan That Works

Living with a long-term condition, whether that is diabetes, asthma, arthritis or heart disease, means making hundreds of small decisions every day. You plan your diet against m...