The Times Australia
The Times News

.

How China is controlling the COVID origins narrative — silencing critics and locking up dissenters

  • Written by John Garrick, University Fellow in Law, Charles Darwin University

Just over a year has gone by since the novel coronavirus first emerged[1] in the Chinese city of Wuhan and the world still has many questions about where and how it originated.

The World Health Organisation is sending a team to China[2] this week to investigate the origins of the virus — which has now claimed nearly 2 million[3] lives globally — but one health expert warns expectations for the visit should be set “very low[4]”.

The Chinese government has greatly restrained any attempts to investigate the origins of COVID-19[5] — both internally and by foreign experts — while at the same time advocating alternate theories[6] that the pandemic originated elsewhere.

The top leadership sees control over this narrative[7] as vital to its hold over the Chinese population and the boosting of its international reputation.

Read more: Murky origins: why China will never welcome a global inquiry into the source of COVID-19[8]

The stakes could not be higher because Beijing has presented[9] the Communist Party’s strong, centralised rule as the key to the country’s success at controlling the pandemic and reviving its economy.

This has been contrasted with disastrous efforts to control the disease in the US under the Trump administration. The state-run Global Times has called the US a “living hell[10]”.

Against this backdrop, Yanzhong Huang[11], a senior fellow with the Council on Foreign Relations, says the WHO investigation team

will have to be politically savvy and draw conclusions that are acceptable to all the major parties.

Citizen journalists disappear after reporting the truth

Part of controlling the Communist Party narrative has entailed the detention of many citizen journalists who sounded the alarm about the virus in its early days, exposed the government’s attempts to cover it up and criticised its early response to control it.

In late December, one of these independent journalists, Zhang Zhan[12], was sentenced to four years imprisonment for the crime of “picking quarrels and provoking trouble”.

A former lawyer, Zhang travelled to Wuhan in February to talk to people about how they were coping in lockdown. She shared videos and talked about what she observed, at one point noting[13] the fear people felt toward the government was actually greater than their fear of the virus.

In an interview before her detention, she said[14]

Maybe I have a rebellious soul … I’m just documenting the truth. Why can’t I show the truth?

Some of Zhang’s video reports from Wuhan.

Zhang is just one of many critics whom the government has attempted to silence.

Chinese law professor Xu Zhangrun was detained by police[15] for a week after writing articles critical of Chinese President Xi Jinping, and then fired from his position at a university. He remains under surveillance and has been banned from leaving Beijing, but he continues to write[16].

Others have simply disappeared. The outspoken lawyer and citizen journalist Chen Qiushi[17] went missing in February after reporting from Wuhan and didn’t reappear until late September. He also remained under “strict supervision[18]” by the authorities.

And Wuhan businessman Fang Bin[19], who was detained in early February after posting videos purporting to show COVID victims[20] inside hospitals, hasn’t been heard from since[21].

Using the security system and courts to target civil society

Under Xi’s leadership, the Communist Party has become increasingly vigorous in guarding the official propaganda[22] around party ideology and Xi’s rule from any form of criticism.

While Xi emphasised in a 2013 speech[23] the importance of the propaganda and “ideological leadership” to the country, the pandemic has allowed China’s party-state to extend its ideological control over the courts, eliminating any pretence of judicial autonomy.

This manipulation of rule-of-law institutions can be seen in the prosecution of citizen journalists like Zhang Zhan and anyone else who questions or criticises the official party line.

Read more: China has a new way to exert political pressure: weaponising its courts against foreigners[24]

Marxist scholars[25] and party propagandists[26] argue there are no contradictions between party ideology and “rule of law”. In China, they say, there is no need for a legal separation of powers to ensure justice because the party is the ultimate expression of the people’s will[27] when it comes to law and order.

In essence, the Communist Party is the rule of law, with Chinese characteristics.

The party has long used the security system and courts in this way to “kill chickens to scare monkeys” (a Chinese idiom meaning to punish an individual as an example to others).

In the past, the targets have typically been prominent political dissidents, such as Liu Xiaobo[28] and Wei Jingsheng[29], and human rights lawyers[30].

What is new and disturbing is the use of this tactic to eradicate all dissent and perceived threats to the party’s rule from civil society. Those targeted in recent years include Chinese-Australian writer Yang Hengjun[31], Hong Kong media mogul Jimmy Lai[32] and Chinese-Australian journalist Cheng Lei[33], as well as many foreigners[34].

Jimmy Lai has been charged with foreign collusion. Jimmy Lai (centre) is charged with alleged foreign collusion under Hong Kong’s new national security law. Kin Cheung/AP

Forced silence does not mean public belief

This domestic political context makes it unlikely the WHO researchers will be allowed to fully investigate all hypotheses as to the origins of the coronavirus, such as the claim it could have been caused by a leak at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

Although China’s so-called “Bat Woman[35]”, virologist Shi Zhengli, has said she’d welcome a visit[36] by the WHO team to the lab, leaked government documents tell another story.

Read more: Re-creating live-animal markets in the lab lets researchers see how pathogens like coronavirus jump species[37]

According to the documents, published by the Associated Press[38] this month, the government is monitoring scientists’ findings and requiring any research to be approved by a new task force under Xi’s direct command before publication.

Zhang’s case reveals how challenges to official narratives are now being dealt with in China. It also shows that Chinese citizens do not always find official narratives convincing and propagandists cannot force them to believe in ideology. The forced silencing of critics does not equate to people believing in the official party line.

With the origins of COVID-19, China’s citizens — and the world — deserve truth, not politically convenient spin.

References

  1. ^ first emerged (www.who.int)
  2. ^ sending a team to China (www.abc.net.au)
  3. ^ nearly 2 million (www.worldometers.info)
  4. ^ very low (www.theguardian.com)
  5. ^ origins of COVID-19 (www.smh.com.au)
  6. ^ advocating alternate theories (www.nytimes.com)
  7. ^ control over this narrative (www.scmp.com)
  8. ^ Murky origins: why China will never welcome a global inquiry into the source of COVID-19 (theconversation.com)
  9. ^ presented (www.scmp.com)
  10. ^ living hell (www.globaltimes.cn)
  11. ^ Yanzhong Huang (www.reuters.com)
  12. ^ Zhang Zhan (www.scmp.com)
  13. ^ noting (www.cbsnews.com)
  14. ^ she said (www.scmp.com)
  15. ^ detained by police (theconversation.com)
  16. ^ continues to write (supchina.com)
  17. ^ Chen Qiushi (www.voanews.com)
  18. ^ strict supervision (www.bbc.com)
  19. ^ Fang Bin (qz.com)
  20. ^ posting videos purporting to show COVID victims (www.youtube.com)
  21. ^ hasn’t been heard from since (www.hrw.org)
  22. ^ official propaganda (papers.ssrn.com)
  23. ^ Xi emphasised in a 2013 speech (www.xinhuanet.com)
  24. ^ China has a new way to exert political pressure: weaponising its courts against foreigners (theconversation.com)
  25. ^ Marxist scholars (www.tandfonline.com)
  26. ^ party propagandists (www.chinahumanrights.org)
  27. ^ ultimate expression of the people’s will (link.springer.com)
  28. ^ Liu Xiaobo (en.wikipedia.org)
  29. ^ Wei Jingsheng (chinadigitaltimes.net)
  30. ^ human rights lawyers (www.nytimes.com)
  31. ^ Chinese-Australian writer Yang Hengjun (theconversation.com)
  32. ^ Hong Kong media mogul Jimmy Lai (www.theguardian.com)
  33. ^ Chinese-Australian journalist Cheng Lei (www.bbc.com)
  34. ^ foreigners (theconversation.com)
  35. ^ Bat Woman (www.scientificamerican.com)
  36. ^ welcome a visit (www.bbc.com)
  37. ^ Re-creating live-animal markets in the lab lets researchers see how pathogens like coronavirus jump species (theconversation.com)
  38. ^ published by the Associated Press (www.smh.com.au)

Read more https://theconversation.com/how-china-is-controlling-the-covid-origins-narrative-silencing-critics-and-locking-up-dissenters-152751

Times Magazine

Building a Strong Online Presence with Katoomba Web Design

Katoomba web design is more than just creating a website that looks good—it’s about building an online presence that reflects your brand, engages your audience, and drives results. For local businesses in the Blue Mountains, a well-designed website a...

September Sunset Polo

International Polo Tour To Bridge Historic Sport, Life-Changing Philanthropy, and Breath-Taking Beauty On Saturday, September 6th, history will be made as the International Polo Tour (IPT), a sports leader headquartered here in South Florida...

5 Ways Microsoft Fabric Simplifies Your Data Analytics Workflow

In today's data-driven world, businesses are constantly seeking ways to streamline their data analytics processes. The sheer volume and complexity of data can be overwhelming, often leading to bottlenecks and inefficiencies. Enter the innovative da...

7 Questions to Ask Before You Sign IT Support Companies in Sydney

Choosing an IT partner can feel like buying an insurance policy you hope you never need. The right choice keeps your team productive, your data safe, and your budget predictable. The wrong choice shows up as slow tickets, surprise bills, and risky sh...

Choosing the Right Legal Aid Lawyer in Sutherland Shire: Key Considerations

Legal aid services play an essential role in ensuring access to justice for all. For people in the Sutherland Shire who may not have the financial means to pay for private legal assistance, legal aid ensures that everyone has access to representa...

Watercolor vs. Oil vs. Digital: Which Medium Fits Your Pet's Personality?

When it comes to immortalizing your pet’s unique personality in art, choosing the right medium is essential. Each artistic medium, whether watercolor, oil, or digital, has distinct qualities that can bring out the spirit of your furry friend in dif...

The Times Features

How much money do you need to be happy? Here’s what the research says

Over the next decade, Elon Musk could become the world’s first trillionaire[1]. The Tesla board recently proposed a US$1 trillion (A$1.5 trillion) compensation plan, if Musk ca...

NSW has a new fashion sector strategy – but a sustainable industry needs a federally legislated response

The New South Wales government recently announced the launch of the NSW Fashion Sector Strategy, 2025–28[1]. The strategy, developed in partnership with the Australian Fashion ...

From Garden to Gift: Why Roses Make the Perfect Present

Think back to the last time you gave or received flowers. Chances are, roses were part of the bunch, or maybe they were the whole bunch.   Roses tend to leave an impression. Even ...

Do I have insomnia? 5 reasons why you might not

Even a single night of sleep trouble can feel distressing and lonely. You toss and turn, stare at the ceiling, and wonder how you’ll cope tomorrow. No wonder many people star...

Wedding Photography Trends You Need to Know (Before You Regret Your Album)

Your wedding album should be a timeless keepsake, not something you cringe at years later. Trends may come and go, but choosing the right wedding photography approach ensures your ...

Can you say no to your doctor using an AI scribe?

Doctors’ offices were once private. But increasingly, artificial intelligence (AI) scribes (also known as digital scribes) are listening in. These tools can record and trans...