Google AI
The Times Australia
The Times Australia
.

Major survey finds most people use AI regularly at work – but almost half admit to doing so inappropriately

  • Written by Nicole Gillespie, Professor of Management; Chair in Trust, Melbourne Business School

Have you ever used ChatGPT to draft a work email? Perhaps to summarise a report, research a topic or analyse data in a spreadsheet? If so, you certainly aren’t alone.

Artificial intelligence (AI) tools are rapidly transforming the world of work. Released today, our global study[1] of more than 32,000 workers from 47 countries shows that 58% of employees intentionally use AI at work – with a third using it weekly or daily.

Most employees who use it say they’ve gained some real productivity and performance benefits from adopting AI tools.

However, a concerning number are using AI in highly risky ways – such as uploading sensitive information into public tools, relying on AI answers without checking them, and hiding their use of it.

There’s an urgent need for policies, training and governance on responsible use of AI, to ensure it enhances – not undermines – how work is done.

Our research

We surveyed 32,352 employees in 47 countries, covering all global geographical regions[2] and occupational groups[3].

Most employees report performance benefits from AI adoption at work. These include improvements in:

  • efficiency (67%)
  • information access (61%)
  • innovation (59%)
  • work quality (58%).

These findings echo prior research demonstrating AI can drive productivity gains for employees[4] and organisations[5].

We found general-purpose generative AI tools, such as ChatGPT, are by far the most widely used. About 70% of employees rely on free, public tools, rather than AI solutions provided by their employer (42%).

However, almost half the employees we surveyed who use AI say they have done so in ways that could be considered inappropriate (47%) and even more (63%) have seen other employees using AI inappropriately.

Prompt in ChatGPT saying write an email requesting a deadline extension for my project
Most survey respondents who use AI use free, public tools, such as ChatGPT. Tada Images/Shutterstock[6]

Sensitive information

One key concern surrounding AI tools in the workplace is the handling of sensitive company information – such as financial, sales or customer information.

Nearly half (48%) of employees have uploaded sensitive company or customer information into public generative AI tools, and 44% admit to having used AI at work in ways that go against organisational policies.

This aligns with other research[7] showing 27% of content put into AI tools by employees is sensitive.

Check your answer

We found complacent use of AI is also widespread, with 66% of respondents saying they have relied on AI output without evaluating it. It is unsurprising then that a majority (56%) have made mistakes in their work due to AI.

Younger employees (aged 18-34 years) are more likely to engage in inappropriate and complacent use than older employees (aged 35 or older).

This carries serious risks for organisations and employees. Such mistakes have already led to well-documented cases of financial loss[8], reputational damage[9] and privacy breaches[10].

About a third (35%) of employees say the use of AI tools in their workplace has increased privacy and compliance risks.

‘Shadow’ AI use

When employees aren’t transparent about how they use AI, the risks become even more challenging to manage.

We found most employees have avoided revealing when they use AI (61%), presented AI-generated content as their own (55%), and used AI tools without knowing if it is allowed (66%).

This invisible or “shadow AI[11]” use doesn’t just exacerbate risks – it also severely hampers an organisation’s ability to detect, manage and mitigate risks.

A lack of training, guidance and governance appears to be fuelling this complacent use. Despite their prevalence, only a third of employees (34%) say their organisation has a policy guiding the use of generative AI tools, with 6% saying their organisation bans it.

Pressure to adopt AI may also fuel complacent use, with half of employees fearing they will be left behind if they do not.

Spreadsheet data on a laptop screen
Almost half of respondents who use AI said they had uploaded company financial, sales or customer information into public AI tools. Andrey_Popov/Shutterstock[12]

Better literacy and oversight

Collectively, our findings reveal a significant gap in the governance of AI tools and an urgent need for organisations to guide and manage how employees use them in their everyday work. Addressing this will require a proactive and deliberate approach.

Investing in responsible AI training and developing employees’ AI literacy[13] is key. Our modelling shows self-reported AI literacy – including training, knowledge, and efficacy – predicts not only whether employees adopt AI tools but also whether they critically engage with them.

This includes how well they verify the tools’ output, and consider their limitations before making decisions.

Woman instructing man using a computer
Training can improve how people engage with AI tools and critically evaluate their output. PeopleImages.com - Yuri A/Shutterstock[14]

We found AI literacy is also associated with greater trust in AI use at work and more performance benefits from its use.

Despite this, less than half of employees (47%) report having received AI training or related education.

Organisations also need to put in place clear policies, guidelines and guardrails, systems of accountability and oversight, and data privacy and security measures.

There are many resources to help organisations develop robust AI governance systems and support responsible AI use[15].

The right culture

On top of this, it’s crucial to create a psychologically safe[16] work environment, where employees feel comfortable to share how and when they are using AI tools.

The benefits of such a culture go beyond better oversight and risk management. It is also central to developing a culture of shared learning and experimentation[17] that supports responsible diffusion of AI use and innovation.

AI has the potential to improve the way we work. But it takes an AI-literate workforce, robust governance and clear guidance, and a culture that supports safe, transparent and accountable use. Without these elements, AI becomes just another unmanaged liability.

References

  1. ^ global study (mbs.edu)
  2. ^ geographical regions (unstats.un.org)
  3. ^ occupational groups (ilostat.ilo.org)
  4. ^ for employees (academic.oup.com)
  5. ^ organisations (news.st-andrews.ac.uk)
  6. ^ Tada Images/Shutterstock (www.shutterstock.com)
  7. ^ research (www.cyberhaven.com)
  8. ^ financial loss (www.9news.com.au)
  9. ^ reputational damage (edition.cnn.com)
  10. ^ privacy breaches (ovic.vic.gov.au)
  11. ^ shadow AI (www.ibm.com)
  12. ^ Andrey_Popov/Shutterstock (www.shutterstock.com)
  13. ^ AI literacy (www.digitaleducationcouncil.com)
  14. ^ PeopleImages.com - Yuri A/Shutterstock (www.shutterstock.com)
  15. ^ responsible AI use (oecd.ai)
  16. ^ psychologically safe (journals.sagepub.com)
  17. ^ experimentation (doi.org)

Read more https://theconversation.com/major-survey-finds-most-people-use-ai-regularly-at-work-but-almost-half-admit-to-doing-so-inappropriately-255405

Subcategories

Should the government encourage people to work from home to save fuel?

The current fuel crisis[1], instigated by the war in the Middle East, has prompted countries to respond in dif...

Times Magazine

CRO Tech Stack: A Technical Guide to Conversion Rate Optimization Tools

The fascinating thing is that the value of this website lies in the fact that creating a high-cali...

How Decentralised Applications Are Reshaping Enterprise Software in Australia

Australian businesses are experiencing a quiet revolution in how they manage data, execute agreeme...

Bambu Lab P2S 3D Printer Review: High-End Performance Meets Everyday Usability

After a full month of hands-on testing, the Bambu Lab P2S 3D printer has proven itself to be one...

Nearly Half of Disadvantaged Australian Schools Run Libraries on Less Than $1000 a Year

A new national snapshot from Dymocks Children’s Charities reveals outdated books, no librarians ...

Growing EV popularity is leading to queues at fast chargers. Could a kerbside charger network help?

The war on Iran has made crystal clear how shaky our reliance on fossil fuels is. It’s no surpri...

TRUCKIES UNDER THE PUMP AS FUEL PRICES BECOME TWO THIRDS OF OPERATING COSTS FOR SOME BUSINESS OWNERS

As Australia’s fuel crisis continues, truck drivers across the nation are being hit hard despite t...

The Times Features

Mortgage Stress – it is happening. Here is what is driv…

Mortgage stress is no longer a fringe issue confined to a small group of overextended borrowers...

Mortgage Lending in Australia: Brokers vs Banks — Trust…

For most Australians, taking out a mortgage is the single largest financial decision they will e...

Building Costs in Australia: Permits, Taxes, Contributi…

Australia’s housing debate is often framed around supply and demand, interest rates, and populat...

Airfares: What the Iran Disarmament Campaign Means for …

For Australians planning their next interstate getaway or long-awaited overseas holiday, the cos...

Interest-free loans needed for agriculture amid fuel cr…

The Albanese Government should release the details of its plan to provide interest-free loans to b...

Next stage of works to modernise Port of Devonport

TasPorts is progressing the next stage of its QuayLink program at the Port of Devonport, with up...

‘Cuddle therapy’ sounds like what we all need right now…

Cuddle therapy is having a moment[1]. The idea for this emerging therapy is for you to book in...

The Decentralized DJ: How Play House is Rewriting the M…

The traditional music industry model is currently facing its most significant challenge since the ...

What Australians Use YouTube For

In Australia, YouTube is no longer just a video platform—it is infrastructure. It entertains, e...