Google AI
The Times Australia

Times Media Advertising

4 out of 5 parents support teaching gender and sexuality diversity in Australian schools

  • Written by: Tania Ferfolja, Associate Professor, School of Education, Western Sydney University
4 out of 5 parents support teaching gender and sexuality diversity in Australian schools

Debates about how schools acknowledge gender and sexuality diversity have been ongoing in Australia. It’s often claimed parents oppose the inclusion of gender and sexuality diversity content in the teaching of their children. But our research[1] shows four out of five parents support such content being included in the relationships and sexual health curriculum.

Debate about these issues has been revived by the federal Religious Discrimination Bill[2] and the NSW One Nation’s Education Legislation Amendment (Parental Rights) Bill[3]. The now-shelved[4] federal bill would have allowed religious schools to expel transgender and gender-diverse students. The NSW bill seeks to revoke the accreditation of educators who discuss gender and sexuality diversity in a public school.

Both bills would have the same effect: the erasure of gender and sexuality diversity from schools.

Read more: NSW inquiry rejects expert advice on Parental Rights Bill, and it will cause students to suffer[5]

Until now there has been no comprehensive research in Australia that examines what parents actually want in relation to such topics in their child’s education. This lack of research-based evidence has meant even teachers are unsure[6] about whether or not they are allowed to discuss gender and sexuality diversity.

Our landmark study[7], published in the journal Sex Education, sheds light on this issue. Our findings challenge the idea that most parents oppose the inclusion of gender and sexuality diversity-related content in school.

What did the study find?

We surveyed 2,093 parents of students attending government schools across the nation. To ensure results could be considered nationally representative, data were weighted using a probability panel of Australian adults[8]. Both demographic markers (including gender, location and languages spoken at home) and attitudes to education that’s inclusive of gender and sexuality diversity were used to weight the final data set.

The survey asked fundamental questions about parents’ views on the “who, what, when” of relationships and sexuality education. There was a specific focus on how parents felt about including gender and sexuality diversity in the curriculum.

The findings show 94% of parents want relationships and sexuality education in schools, in keeping with the current Australian Curriculum[9]. When asked about gender and sexuality diversity across six different topic areas, on average, 82% of parent respondents support their inclusion as part of the relationships and sexual health curriculum from kindergarten through to year 12.

In terms of understandings of gender diversity by students at different ages, two-thirds of parents (68%) want this topic introduced in the curriculum by the end of stage 4 of schooling (years 7 and 8). In keeping with other areas, over 80% of parents support its inclusion by the end of year 12.

Parents’ reasons for supporting inclusion were apparent in their views on the purpose of relationships and sexual health education. Given a choice of four central purpose statements, the largest group of parents (nearly 50%) felt this curriculum area should focus on student “empowerment, choice, consent, and acceptance of diversity”.

It’s about fairness, inclusion and safety

These findings reflect the culture of fairness and inclusion that most Australians believe in. The results point to parents’ understanding of the importance of inclusion. They object to the school-based harassment of gender and sexuality diverse students[10] in this country.

Read more: 9 in 10 LGBTQ+ students say they hear homophobic language at school, and 1 in 3 hear it almost every day[11]

These young people are rarely represented in curriculums. They are not only invisible, but also experience discrimination by omission.

Parents are likely to know Australia has one of the highest rates of youth suicide[12] in the world. Tragically, the rate is even higher[13] for gender and sexuality diverse young people. Their experiences at school are undoubtedly linked to this outcome.

In our study, nearly 90% of parents wanted to see the curriculum address discrimination and bullying of gender and sexuality diverse people. This finding speaks to their desire to create safe and welcoming schools for all students.

What does this mean for teachers?

This research has important implications for teachers of relationships and sexual health education. Many report[14] they avoid gender and sexuality diversity and fear community backlash.

Teachers’ unease prevails despite federal government guidance[15] that promotes the well-being of students. The guidelines encourage schools to create positive learning environments that foster diversity and respectful relationships and support students to feel safe, connected and included.

Read more: Free schools guide about inclusiveness and climate science is not ideological — it's based on evidence[16]

The public response[17] to the Religious Discrimination Bill and its subsequent shelving highlights how it is inherently anathema to punish and exclude children and young people from school based on their identity. Australian teachers need to be supported to create a school culture where these students can feel safe, welcome and informed about their relationships and sexual health.

Educators across the country would benefit from additional guidance and support to feel confident that discussing these topics is in line with the views of the majority of their students’ parents.

References

  1. ^ our research (www.tandfonline.com)
  2. ^ Religious Discrimination Bill (www.aph.gov.au)
  3. ^ Education Legislation Amendment (Parental Rights) Bill (www.parliament.nsw.gov.au)
  4. ^ now-shelved (theconversation.com)
  5. ^ NSW inquiry rejects expert advice on Parental Rights Bill, and it will cause students to suffer (theconversation.com)
  6. ^ teachers are unsure (www.sciencedirect.com)
  7. ^ Our landmark study (www.tandfonline.com)
  8. ^ probability panel of Australian adults (www.srcentre.com.au)
  9. ^ current Australian Curriculum (www.australiancurriculum.edu.au)
  10. ^ school-based harassment of gender and sexuality diverse students (apo.org.au)
  11. ^ 9 in 10 LGBTQ+ students say they hear homophobic language at school, and 1 in 3 hear it almost every day (theconversation.com)
  12. ^ highest rates of youth suicide (www.aihw.gov.au)
  13. ^ the rate is even higher (academic.oup.com)
  14. ^ Many report (opal.latrobe.edu.au)
  15. ^ federal government guidance (www.dese.gov.au)
  16. ^ Free schools guide about inclusiveness and climate science is not ideological — it's based on evidence (theconversation.com)
  17. ^ public response (www.abc.net.au)

Read more https://theconversation.com/4-out-of-5-parents-support-teaching-gender-and-sexuality-diversity-in-australian-schools-176787

Times Magazine

The Human Supplement Craze Has Officially Gone to the Dogs (Literally)

Australians’ appetite for supplements is no longer limited to their own vitamin cabinets. New reta...

AI Guilt: It’s Real — But it is irrational

Artificial intelligence is rapidly becoming one of the most powerful tools ever made available to ...

Australians Are Keeping Their Cars Longer — And It’s Changing The Market

Australia’s car market is undergoing a subtle but important transformation. People are keeping th...

Streaming Fatigue: Australians Overwhelmed By Subscriptions

Streaming was once supposed to simplify entertainment. Instead, many Australians now feel overwhe...

Why Shopping Centres No Longer Feel Exciting

There was a time when going to the shopping centre felt like an event. Families spent entire Satu...

Harry And Meghan: Less Powerful As Royals, More Powerful As Content

For all the claims of “Harry and Meghan fatigue”, the world’s media still cannot stop talking abou...

The Times Features

Nationals move Bill to protect women. Sall Grover inter…

Matt Canavan  All good. Look, well, it's great to be here with my friend and colleague, Alison Pe...

The Human Supplement Craze Has Officially Gone to the D…

Australians’ appetite for supplements is no longer limited to their own vitamin cabinets. New reta...

The Teals: Can They Spoil Australia’s New Attraction to…

Australian politics is shifting again. For years, the dominant national contest revolved around L...

Property Paralysis: Buyers Hesitate As Australia’s Hous…

Australia’s property market may still be active, but beneath the auctions, listings and glossy rea...

The Return Of Practical Luxury: Buyers Want Quality Aga…

For years, consumer culture revolved around speed and abundance. Fast fashion.Fast furniture.Fast...

People Are Going Out Less — And Businesses Know It

Restaurants are full on some nights. Concerts still sell tickets. Sporting events attract crowds. ...

Why Shopping Centres No Longer Feel Exciting

There was a time when going to the shopping centre felt like an event. Families spent entire Satu...

The Liberal Party Faces Its Greatest Question Since Men…

When Robert Menzies founded the Liberal Party of Australia in the aftermath of World War II, Austr...

The Noise Around the 2026 Federal Budget Does Not Match…

Every time the government changes the rules around property investment, the same thing happens. Ph...