The Times Australia
Google AI
The Times World News

.

The gas tax's tortured history shows how hard it is to fund new infrastructure

  • Written by Theodore J. Kury, Director of Energy Studies, University of Florida
The gas tax's tortured history shows how hard it is to fund new infrastructure

As the Biden administration and Republicans negotiate a possible infrastructure spending package[1], how to pay for it has been a key sticking point.

President Joe Biden and Democrats in Congress want to raise taxes on the rich[2], while some Republicans have been pushing for an increase in the gas tax[3] – which would be the first in 28 years. A bipartisan group of senators recently crafted a compromise bill that would pay for just under US$1 trillion in spending on rail, roads and bridges[4] over five years in part by indexing the gas tax to inflation. Democrats call this regressive[5] because it would raise taxes on working Americans.

As the director of energy studies at the University of Florida’s Public Utility Research Center, I’ve studied both taxes on energy[6] and how the government[7] spends money on infrastructure[8].

Throughout the gas tax’s controversial history, leaders have frequently called upon this revenue source when serious infrastructure investment is needed.

The first 40 years

This resilient levy is a major source of U.S. funding for roads and transit today. It originated during the Great Depression[9] as a “temporary” penny-per-gallon gasoline tax. At the time, a gallon cost about 18 cents[10], or about $2.90 in 2021 dollars[11].

As he signed the Revenue Act of 1932[12] into law, President Herbert Hoover[13] lauded “the willingness of our people to accept this added burden in these times in order impregnably to establish the credit of the federal government.”

The original gas tax, an emergency measure intended to bolster the budget and fund national defense spending[14], not to meet transportation needs, was slated to expire in 1933. Instead, persistent budget deficits throughout the New Deal and World War II[15] kept it in force throughout Franklin D. Roosevelt’s administration[16] over the objections of the oil, automotive and travel industries. It became a permanent 1.5-cent levy in 1941[17].

Multiple efforts to do away with the gas tax ever since have failed.

For example, Congress again scheduled the tax’s repeal in 1951[18] when it increased it to 2 cents as a source of revenue related to the Korean War. Instead, lawmakers agreed to keep the tax on the books to help pay for one of President Dwight D. Eisenhower’s top priorities, the national interstate highway system[19].

In 1956[20] the levy rose once more, to 3 cents, when Americans were paying about 30 cents for a gallon of gas[21]. At the same time, the government established the Highway Trust Fund[22] to use the gas tax revenue to pay for building and maintaining the new interstates.

The tax rose to 4 cents per gallon in 1959[23] and froze at that level for more than two decades.

Running on empty

Gas tax revenue stopped keeping up with the expenses it was supposed to cover in the early 1970s following a severe bout of inflation[24] and OPEC’s oil embargo[25]. U.S. gas prices soared from about 36 cents per gallon in 1972 to $1.31 in 1981.

Responding to what members of both major political parties saw as a transportation infrastructure crisis[26], Congress more than doubled the tax to 9 cents per gallon as part of the Surface Transportation Assistance Act of 1982[27]. The same law split the Highway Trust Fund and its revenue stream into two parts: The first 8 cents would finance roadwork while the other penny would finance mass transit projects.

This hike may have struck drivers as a sharp increase, but public spending on transportation infrastructure would continue to fall as a percentage of all outlays[28].

In 1984, Congress increased spending on highways by funneling proceeds from fines and other penalties that businesses pay for safety violations[29], such as failing to label hazardous materials or forcing drivers to work too many hours in a row.

Congress boosted the tax twice more in the 1990s but primarily to reduce the then-ballooning federal deficit[30]. Only half of a 5-cent increase in 1990 went to highways and transit, while a 4.3-cent lift three years later went entirely to lowering the deficit.

By 1997, the government had redirected all gas tax revenue reserved for deficit reduction[31] to the Highway Trust Fund[32], where it still flows today.

Along the way, other federal fuel taxes[33] arose, including a 24.4-cent-per-gallon diesel tax and taxes on methanol and compressed natural gas. And state fuel taxes[34], which in most cases began before the federal gas tax[35], range from as low as 8.95 cents per gallon in Alaska to as high as 57.6 cents per gallon in Pennsylvania.

[Understand key political developments, each week. Subscribe to The Conversation’s politics newsletter[36].]

Making do

Since 1993, when the federal gas tax was first parked at 18.4 cents, inflation and rising construction costs[37] have eroded its effectiveness as a transportation-related revenue source. In addition, U.S. vehicles have grown more fuel-efficient[38] overall – which means Americans use less fuel[39] for every mile they drive.

As a result, highway and transit spending has significantly outpaced the revenue collected from the gas tax and other sources. Since 2008, the government has transferred over $80 billion[40] to the fund that it had to take from other sources.

But it’s still not enough. The American Society of Civil Engineers[41], which gives U.S. infrastructure a C-minus, is calling on the government and private sector to increase spending on roads and bridges by at least $2.5 trillion within a decade.

While it’s true the gas tax may be regressive[42] because lower-income people pay the same rate as those who earn higher incomes, there are still advantages to this tax.

For one thing, it follows the “user pays” principle[43] of providing government services. Under this principle, the people using the roads are held responsible for paying for their upkeep. As the number of motorists using electric vehicles increases, however, this may become less true over time.

Further, it would also create an incentive to at least marginally decrease the use of fossil fuels[44], accomplishing another goal of the administration.

Finally, the government could always subsidize the tax for the poor, perhaps through annual lump-sum payments, making it less regressive.

Clearly, U.S. infrastructure is in dire need of upgrading and investment. At the end of the day, Americans will pay for it one way or another – whether in taxes or through costs of unsafe and inadequate infrastructure, including in lost lives[45]. How the government pays for investment may matter less than that it finally does it.

This is an updated version of an article first published on Feb. 27, 2018[46].

References

  1. ^ negotiate a possible infrastructure spending package (thehill.com)
  2. ^ want to raise taxes on the rich (www.nytimes.com)
  3. ^ Republicans have been pushing for an increase in the gas tax (www.businessinsider.com)
  4. ^ would pay for just under US$1 trillion in spending on rail, roads and bridges (www.wsj.com)
  5. ^ Democrats call this regressive (www.businessinsider.com)
  6. ^ taxes on energy (warrington.ufl.edu)
  7. ^ how the government (go.pardot.com)
  8. ^ spends money on infrastructure (warrington.ufl.edu)
  9. ^ originated during the Great Depression (fraser.stlouisfed.org)
  10. ^ cost about 18 cents (energy.gov)
  11. ^ about $2.90 in 2021 dollars (fred.stlouisfed.org)
  12. ^ Revenue Act of 1932 (fraser.stlouisfed.org)
  13. ^ President Herbert Hoover (www.fhwa.dot.gov)
  14. ^ bolster the budget and fund national defense spending (itep.org)
  15. ^ persistent budget deficits throughout the New Deal and World War II (fas.org)
  16. ^ in force throughout Franklin D. Roosevelt’s administration (www.fhwa.dot.gov)
  17. ^ permanent 1.5-cent levy in 1941 (www.thoughtco.com)
  18. ^ Congress again scheduled the tax’s repeal in 1951 (www.govtrack.us)
  19. ^ national interstate highway system (www.fhwa.dot.gov)
  20. ^ In 1956 (www.history.com)
  21. ^ 30 cents for a gallon of gas (energy.gov)
  22. ^ Highway Trust Fund (www.fhwa.dot.gov)
  23. ^ 4 cents per gallon in 1959 (www.finance.senate.gov)
  24. ^ bout of inflation (www.investopedia.com)
  25. ^ oil embargo (www.thebalance.com)
  26. ^ transportation infrastructure crisis (www.fhwa.dot.gov)
  27. ^ Surface Transportation Assistance Act of 1982 (www.govtrack.us)
  28. ^ fall as a percentage of all outlays (www.cbo.gov)
  29. ^ businesses pay for safety violations (www.ccjdigital.com)
  30. ^ reduce the then-ballooning federal deficit (www.congress.gov)
  31. ^ redirected all gas tax revenue reserved for deficit reduction (fas.org)
  32. ^ Highway Trust Fund (www.fhwa.dot.gov)
  33. ^ other federal fuel taxes (www.fhwa.dot.gov)
  34. ^ state fuel taxes (www.taxadmin.org)
  35. ^ began before the federal gas tax (fas.org)
  36. ^ Subscribe to The Conversation’s politics newsletter (theconversation.com)
  37. ^ rising construction costs (edzarenski.com)
  38. ^ vehicles have grown more fuel-efficient (www.wired.com)
  39. ^ use less fuel (www.eia.gov)
  40. ^ $80 billion (www.fhwa.dot.gov)
  41. ^ American Society of Civil Engineers (www.asce.org)
  42. ^ may be regressive (www.thebalance.com)
  43. ^ “user pays” principle (ppiaf.org)
  44. ^ at least marginally decrease the use of fossil fuels (www.nber.org)
  45. ^ lost lives (www.nytimes.com)
  46. ^ Feb. 27, 2018 (theconversation.com)

Read more https://theconversation.com/the-gas-taxs-tortured-history-shows-how-hard-it-is-to-fund-new-infrastructure-163152

Times Magazine

Epson launches ELPCS01 mobile projector cart

Designed for the EB-810E[1] projector and provides easy setup for portable displays in flexible ...

Governance Models for Headless CMS in Large Organizations

Where headless CMS is adopted by large enterprises, governance is the single most crucial factor d...

Narwal Freo Z Ultra Robotic Vacuum and Mop Cleaner

Rating: ★★★★☆ (4.4/5)Category: Premium Robot Vacuum & Mop ComboBest for: Busy households, ha...

Shark launches SteamSpot - the shortcut for everyday floor mess

Shark introduces the Shark SteamSpot Steam Mop, a lightweight steam mop designed to make everyda...

Game Together, Stay Together: Logitech G Reveals Gaming Couples Enjoy Higher Relationship Satisfaction

With Valentine’s Day right around the corner, many lovebirds across Australia are planning for the m...

AI threatens to eat business software – and it could change the way we work

In recent weeks, a range of large “software-as-a-service” companies, including Salesforce[1], Se...

The Times Features

AI could help us more accurately screen for breast cancer – new research

At least 20,000[1] Australian women are diagnosed with breast cancer each year. And more than ...

Housing ACT tenants left in unsafe conditions

An ACT Ombudsman report has found that Housing ACT tenants have been left waiting in unsafe and haza...

Shark SteamSpot S2001 Review: A Chemical-Free Way to Tackle Messes and Stubborn Stains

If you're looking for a reliable steam mop that can handle both everyday spills and stubborn stains ...

How Businesses Are Generating Profits in a High-Inflation Economic Environment

Inflation in Australia and globally has surged to multi-decade highs since 2021, driven by pande...

The Effects of the War in the Middle East on Australian Small Businesses

The war in the Middle East is not a distant geopolitical event for Australia. In an interconnect...

Back at uni? How to help your wellbeing while you study

University can be a time of great opportunities, but it can also be very stressful[1]. Many stud...

Taste Port Douglas celebrates 10 years of world-class flavour in the tropics

30+ events, new sunrise and wellness experiences, 20+ chefs and a headline Michelin-star line-up...

Oztent RV tent range. Buy with caution

A review of the Oztent RV "30 second tent" range. Three years ago we bought an RV-4 from BCF Mack...

Essential Upgrades for a Smarter, Safer Australian Home

As we settle into 2026, the concept of the "dream home" has fundamentally shifted. The focus has m...