The Times Australia
Fisher and Paykel Appliances
The Times World News

.

How Operation Phoenix exported violence from Australia to Yugoslavia

  • Written by Alexander Mitchell Lee, PhD Candidate, Crawford School of Public Policy, Australian National University
How Operation Phoenix exported violence from Australia to Yugoslavia

Fifty years ago this month, in June 1972, Yugoslavia’s Territorial Defence Force was desperately trying to contain and kill militants associated with the Australian-based Croatian Revolutionary Brotherhood[1].

For the second time in ten years, foreign-based nationalists were attempting to incite a revolt against the country’s Communist Party government, headed by president Josip Tito. Their aim was to create a Croatia independent of the rest of Yugoslavia.

Believing that now was the time for a revolutionary uprising of Croatians, and having learnt from the smaller, unsuccessful attack in 1963, the militants devised a daring plan to strike deep into the heart of Yugoslavia. The fallout of the operation, which was launched under the code name Operation Phoenix[2], would echo through the governments of both Yugoslavia and Australia.

Read more: Cinema opens a dialogue about coming to terms with Balkans' past[3]

Militants move in to Bosnia

Nineteen men, many of them Croatian Australians and some of them from West Germany, had been preparing for months. Inspired by Fidel Castro’s tactics during Cuba’s revolution and observing the recent suppression of the “Croatian Spring” movement, they believed they could rally the Croatians of Yugoslavia against Tito.

On the night of the June 20 1972, the militants managed to evade detection by the authorities and enter Yugoslavia from Austria. They hijacked a truck and drove to Bugojno, a central Bosnian town with a large ethnically Croatian population. There, they attempted to recruit locals to their cause.

Receiving little sympathy from the resident population – some of whom reported them to the authorities – the militants began to attack Yugoslavian outposts and distribute propaganda. Aware that they had no way to escape the country, their aim was to give maximum visibility to their cause.

Alarmed and embarrassed by these developments, Yugoslavia mobilised thousands of men and placed central Bosnia under quarantine. Tito was personally involved in the operation. After a brutal firefight on June 25 in which most of the attackers were killed, the surviving members of the incursion fled into the hills. Only after four more weeks were all 19 men accounted for. Fifteen militants and 13 Yugoslavians had been killed in this bloody event.

Sebian-language letter
Mobilisation: a report to President Tito on the Yugoslav response to the incident. Petar Dragišić

The four captives faced trial in Yugoslavia. Three were executed and the final member, the youngest, was sentenced to life imprisonment. He would later be released, and ultimately died fighting during the breakup of Yugoslavia almost 20 years later.

Reverberations

For Australia, the incident was unique. An organisation founded and headquartered in this country had attacked Yugoslavia in a stunning way.

Now, new research, and the increasingly accessibility of primary source documents in the former Yugoslavia, has highlighted the considerable impact of the attack in both countries.

The militants didn’t spark an uprising of Croatians against Yugoslavia, and the Yugoslavian government was no doubt reassured by their failure to attract local support. But the psychological impact of an attack deep into the country was considerable. Tito was enraged. His security detail feared that diaspora Croatian nationalists had the will and sophistication to attempt to assassinate the president.

Tito and Brezhnev
Vigilant: President Tito with his Soviet counterpart, Leonid Brezhnev, in November 1973. Wikimedia[4]

The prestige of Yugoslavia’s security services was eroded. To ensure an event like this was never repeated, Tito launched a “special war[5]” on émigré nationalists – a decade-long international campaign of targeted assassinations. Yugoslavia also increased pressure on countries like Australia to repress Croatian nationalist and extremist organisations in their territory.

In Australia, the attack wasn’t reported for weeks. When initial reports arrived from Yugoslavia, they were openly challenged by the Australian government, with Attorney-General Ivor Greenwood declaring[6] he was “not aware of any factual basis for such allegations”. Distrustful of its Yugoslavian counterpart, the Australian government needed to be convinced that the improbable events had actually occurred.

When the full scale of the incident became known in the lead-up to Australia’s 1972 election, the government was caught flat-footed and deeply embarrassed. Police findings that at least some members of the group had been recruited and trained in Australia were widely reported in the press.

Australian security forces, more interested in countering communism than investigating machinations within migrant communities, didn’t have files on many of the Australian-based members of the brotherhood. They were unable to give William McMahon’s Coalition government a clear picture of what had happened and how such a plot came to be organised by Australians.

Read more: Who were Australia's best prime ministers? We asked the experts[7]

The Commonwealth Police quickly launched a series of raids[8] and reported to the government that approximately 300 Croatian Australians were of “particular concern”. The issue of how best to respond to these developments bedevilled a government that was reluctant to alienate migrant communities but didn’t want to give the impression such plotting was acceptable.

The Labor Party, long concerned about the risk posed by violent Croatian nationalism in Australia, seized on the incursion as evidence the McMahon government was unable to grapple with locally based terrorism. They would move aggressively against Croatian nationalist organisations when they came to power later that year, though this led to damaging typecasting of ordinary Croatian Australians and sometimes serious impacts[9] on innocent individuals.

Australian prime minister William McMahon
Flatfooted: Australian prime minister William McMahon, shown here in 1971. US National Archives/Wikimedia[10]

Coupled with the September 1972 bombings[11] of the Yugoslav General Trade and Tourist Agency in Sydney, the June attack in Yugoslavia weakened McMahon’s law and order record going into the 1972 election. Indeed, Labor MPs like Jim Cairns warned the government that any attempt to campaign on law and order had been undermined by their failure to tackle this issue.

While it is impossible to judge the role of a single issue in any campaign, and while neither party made the issue of Croatians central to their election pitch, the incursion had resonance.

Writing later, journalists Laurie Oakes and David Solomon observed[12] that the government’s inability to deal with Croatian nationalist violence meant “Labor could appear stronger on national security than the Coalition”. The narrowness of McMahon’s election loss made every weakness more important.

A forgotten episode of Australian national security history, the 1972 attack is more than just a footnote. The incident had real consequences for the political trajectories of both Australia and Yugoslavia.

References

  1. ^ Croatian Revolutionary Brotherhood (en.wikipedia.org)
  2. ^ Operation Phoenix (www.ceeol.com)
  3. ^ Cinema opens a dialogue about coming to terms with Balkans' past (theconversation.com)
  4. ^ Wikimedia (commons.wikimedia.org)
  5. ^ special war (www.dw.com)
  6. ^ declaring (trove.nla.gov.au)
  7. ^ Who were Australia's best prime ministers? We asked the experts (theconversation.com)
  8. ^ series of raids (trove.nla.gov.au)
  9. ^ impacts (insidestory.org.au)
  10. ^ US National Archives/Wikimedia (commons.wikimedia.org)
  11. ^ bombings (trove.nla.gov.au)
  12. ^ observed (catalogue.nla.gov.au)

Read more https://theconversation.com/how-operation-phoenix-exported-violence-from-australia-to-yugoslavia-185499

Active Wear

Times Magazine

How to Reduce Eye Strain When Using an Extra Screen

Many professionals say two screens are better than one. And they're not wrong! A second screen mak...

Is AI really coming for our jobs and wages? Past predictions of a ‘robot apocalypse’ offer some clues

The robots were taking our jobs – or so we were told over a decade ago. The same warnings are ...

Myer celebrates 70 years of Christmas windows magic with the LEGO Group

To mark the 70th anniversary of the Myer Christmas Windows, Australia’s favourite department store...

Kindness Tops the List: New Survey Reveals Australia’s Defining Value

Commentary from Kath Koschel, founder of Kindness Factory.  In a time where headlines are dominat...

In 2024, the climate crisis worsened in all ways. But we can still limit warming with bold action

Climate change has been on the world’s radar for decades[1]. Predictions made by scientists at...

End-of-Life Planning: Why Talking About Death With Family Makes Funeral Planning Easier

I spend a lot of time talking about death. Not in a morbid, gloomy way—but in the same way we d...

The Times Features

Why Every Australian Should Hold Physical Gold and Silver in 2025

In 2025, Australians are asking the same question investors around the world are quietly whisper...

For Young Australians Not Able to Buy City Property Despite Earning Strong Incomes: What Are the Options?

For decades, the message to young Australians was simple: study hard, get a good job, save a dep...

The AI boom feels eerily similar to 2000’s dotcom crash – with some important differences

If last week’s trillion-dollar slide[1] of major tech stocks felt familiar, it’s because we’ve b...

Research uncovering a plant based option for PMS & period pain

With as many as eight in 10 women experiencing period pain, and up to half reporting  premenstru...

Trump presidency and Australia

Is Having Donald Trump as President Beneficial to Australia — and Why? Donald Trump’s return to...

Why Generosity Is the Most Overlooked Business Strategy

When people ask me what drives success, I always smile before answering. Because after two decades...

Some people choosing DIY super are getting bad advice, watchdog warns

It’s no secret Australians are big fans[1] of a do-it-yourself (DIY) project. How many other cou...

Myer celebrates 70 years of Christmas windows magic with the LEGO Group

To mark the 70th anniversary of the Myer Christmas Windows, Australia’s favourite department store...

Pharmac wants to trim its controversial medicines waiting list – no list at all might be better

New Zealand’s drug-buying agency Pharmac is currently consulting[1] on a change to how it mana...