Here is an overview of the main terms proposed or agreed so far in ceasefire / peace-deal frameworks between Israel and Hamas (to date, no full, final “peace treaty” exists). These terms remain contested, provisional, and may evolve as negotiations continue.

Context and caveats

• The conflict between Israel and Hamas, especially the war following Hamas’s October 7, 2023 attack, has led to repeated rounds of negotiations and temporary ceasefires rather than a permanent peace agreement.

• Many documents speak of “phases,” “sustainable calm,” “hostage-prisoner swaps,” and “redeployment” rather than full peace.

• Implementation is subject to verification, compliance, and pressure from mediators (e.g. United States, Egypt, Qatar) and third parties.

• Some terms are agreed at a high level but lack full detail or consensus on mechanisms, timelines, or enforcement.

With that in mind, below is a synthesis of the key proposed / agreed terms to date, and the main points of contention.

Key terms of ceasefire / peace-deal proposals

1. Ceasefire / cessation of hostilities

• A core element is an immediate pause in fighting: both sides cease military attacks, airstrikes, rocket fire, etc.

• Frontlines are often to be “frozen” or held, avoiding new advances.

• Israel is sometimes required to redeploy or withdraw forces from certain populated areas in Gaza, moving back to agreed-upon lines.

• Restrictions might apply to Israeli overflights or surveillance missions over Gaza (e.g. limited “no-fly” windows).

2. Hostage / prisoner exchange

This is often the centerpiece of any agreement.

• Hamas agrees to release Israeli hostages, both living and deceased remains, in measured phases.

• In parallel, Israel releases Palestinian prisoners / detainees held in Israeli jails, including security detainees and life-sentence prisoners, under negotiated ratios.

• Sometimes, bodies (remains) of deceased hostages and Palestinians are exchanged.

• The exchange might proceed in multiple rounds or phases, rather than all at once.

• A timeframe is commonly proposed: for example, hostages are to be released within 72 hours after certain conditions (like Israeli withdrawal) are met.

3. Humanitarian access, reconstruction, and relief

• Entry of humanitarian aid (food, fuel, medical supplies, rebuilding materials) into Gaza is guaranteed or increased.

• Reconstruction of Gaza’s infrastructure (roads, hospitals, housing, power, water) is a major component of the longer-term plan.

• Displaced Palestinians would be allowed to return to their homes or areas within Gaza.

• Fuel, electricity, and critical services must be restored and maintained.

• Monitoring mechanisms (often international or via mediators) to oversee aid delivery and ensure no diversion.

4. Duration, phases, and transition to “sustainable calm”

• Many proposals break the agreement into three phases (or more), each with specific obligations to be met before advancing to the next.

• The first phase often lasts ~ 42 days (six weeks).

• After initial phases, negotiations begin for permanent ceasefire, full Israeli withdrawal, disarmament, and long-term governance.

• The term “sustainable calm” (rather than “peace”) is often used, implying lower intensity of violence, not total elimination of all hostilities.

5. Security, disarmament, and oversight

• One of Israel’s key demands is demilitarization or neutralizing Hamas’s offensive capabilities (weapons, tunnels, command infrastructure).

• Oversight and guarantees by third parties / mediators (Egypt, Qatar, UN, US) to verify compliance, monitor ceasefire lines, and arbitrate disputes.

• Mechanisms for intelligence sharing, verification of prisoner lists, names, remains, etc.

6. Exclusions, conditions, and contentious items

• Not all prisoners or hostages might be eligible—some high-profile individuals (e.g. Marwan Barghouti) may be explicitly excluded.

• The timing and sequencing (which side moves first) is deeply contested (e.g. whether Israel withdraws before or after hostage release).

• Hamas has generally rejected full disarmament or handing over arms as a precondition.

• The governance of Gaza post-deal (Hamas, Palestinian Authority, or some transitional body) remains unresolved and controversial.

• Israel may not fully withdraw from certain buffer zones or border areas to maintain security.

• Verification disputes, delays in naming hostages, or accusations of violations threaten breakdowns in the truce.

Recent developments (October 2025 deal)

As of October 2025, a new first-phase ceasefire / peace plan has been announced under U.S. mediation (the so-called “20-point plan”) with some revised or additional terms:

• Israel and Hamas reportedly agreed to a first phase ceasefire, hostages release, and Israeli withdrawal to agreed lines.

• Under the deal, 20 living hostages would be released initially in exchange for release of about 1,950 Palestinian prisoners / detainees.

• Israel commits to partial withdrawal of forces from Gaza urban areas as part of the agreement.

• Humanitarian aid is slated to flow more freely into Gaza, and reconstruction efforts are envisioned.

• The return of hostages, both living and deceased, is expected to take place within 72 hours after Israel’s military withdrawal in the designated zones.

• Hamas has rejected external oversight over Gaza governance (i.e. no foreign “Board of Peace” controlling Gaza) as unacceptable.

• Israel has excluded the release of some high-profile figures (like Marwan Barghouti) from the prisoner list.

Because this is still quite fresh, many details remain opaque or subject to negotiation, and the success hinges on implementation, verification, and continued political will.

Challenges, risks, and uncertainties

• Verification and compliance: Ensuring that both sides live up to their commitments is hard, especially amid distrust and asymmetry of power.

• Sequencing disputes: Who moves first (withdrawal vs. hostage release) is a delicate issue. Delay in one step can collapse the whole deal.

• Governance vacuum in Gaza: Deciding who runs Gaza post-deal (Hamas, PA, an international body) is deeply contested.

• Remilitarization: Even if Hamas is constrained temporarily, rearming or rebuilding underground capabilities remains a concern for Israel.

• Political opposition and spoilers: Hardliners on both sides, or regional actors unhappy with concessions, may seek to derail agreement.

• Humanitarian and reconstruction funding: The costs are huge, and donor fatigue or restrictions may limit the rebuilding process.

• Fragility of “calm” vs. durable peace: A ceasefire is easier (relatively) to agree than full resolution of root political issues (statehood, borders, refugees, security).

Summary

There is no finalized, comprehensive peace treaty between Israel and Hamas as of now. What exists are frameworks, phased ceasefire / hostage-prisoner exchange agreements, and proposals for longer-term stabilization. The key terms being negotiated include:

• - Immediate cessation of hostilities and freeze of frontlines

• - Israeli redeployment / withdrawal from parts of Gaza

• - Staggered release of Israeli hostages and exchange of Palestinian prisoners

• - Humanitarian access, reconstruction, and return of displaced persons

• - Phases that lead toward sustainable calm, eventual full withdrawal, and disarmament

• - Oversight by mediators, verification mechanisms, and conditional progress

• - Contested issues around governance, exclusions, and sequencing