Google AI
The Times Australia

Times Media Advertising

55,000 extra social housing homes are being built. But a new study shows that boom still falls short

  • Written by: Hal Pawson, Emeritus Professor of Housing, UNSW Sydney




Thanks to an unprecedented lift in public funding in the 2020s, an extra 55,000 new, good quality homes around Australia will be available to people on the lowest incomes by 2030. That’s almost triple the increase of 20,000 homes in the previous decade.

Residents in these modern “social[1]” homes will generally pay only 25% of their income in rent. Social housing[2] refers to government-subsidised homes, with below market rents.

You’d think federal and state politicians would be shouting about an extra 55,000 social homes by 2030 from those new rooftops.

But, surprisingly, there are no official projections on how many more total dwellings we’ll have in coming years, thanks to recently boosted investment.

For the first time, our new research[3] fills this gap. It shows that even with the recent investment boom, we’re still not building enough to cut the backlog of need – leaving hundreds of thousands of Australians without an adequate, affordable home.

What’s being built vs demolished

Up until now, we’ve known how many social homes[4] Australia has at the end of each year. Remarkably, though, there is still no national data series tracking social housing in greater detail: showing the balance between annual construction, acquisitions and losses.

Filling this gap, our new research[5] reveals around 70,000 new “social” homes are due to built across Australia during the 2020s – a number not seen since the 1980s.

However, many new social housing projects involve replacing ageing public housing[6]. So, along the way, 15,000 older homes will also be lost, mainly when large public housing estates in Sydney[7] and Melbourne[8] are demolished.

After allowing for these demolitions and sales, we found Australia’s total stock of social housing will increase by a total of 55,000 by 2030. That’s up 13% compared to what we had in 2020.

Who’s building the most?

A substantial share of this new housing comes from the Albanese government’s headline initiative, the Housing Australia Future Fund[9].

The fund is set to deliver 20,000 new social homes by 2029 (as well as 20,000 more “affordable[10]” units targeted at low-income renters).

Strikingly, though, we found[11] even more social housing will be delivered by state and territory government-funded programs across the decade. They’re projected to contribute about two-thirds (64%) of all social housing construction from 2020 to 2030.

Overall, the standouts have been Tasmania and Victoria. Between 2020 and 2025, they each built enough to increase the overall share of social housing within their states.

Victoria led the way in 2020, announcing[12] its Big Housing Build[13] program to initially construct 12,000 dwellings. More than three-quarters of them are social housing, while the rest are affordable rentals.

Since then, most states have followed suit[14], although generally on a smaller scale.

In the Australian Capital Territory and New South Wales, new construction barely exceeded stock losses in the first half of the decade. In NSW, substantially ramped-up spending is only now flowing through.

In South Australia, more public housing units were sold or demolished than new social homes added.

Historically, state governments have generally invested in new social housing through the proceeds of land and property sales, or as a matching contribution alongside Commonwealth funds.

So it’s quite a big deal that, since 2020, most states have stepped up to do a lot more.

Why Australia is not keeping up

While we’re building far more than we did from 2000 to 2020, it’s still not enough.

Australia’s 13% increase in social housing this decade matches projected national household growth[15] to 2030. In other words, what we’re building as a nation now is only enough to stop the share of social housing in Australia shrinking further.

Currently the sector accounts for only about 4% of all occupied dwellings in Australia, down from 6% in the mid-1990s.

In contrast, the average across similar wealthy OECD[16] nations is 7%[17].

437,000 reasons to build more

Social housing plays a vital role[18] in the housing system. It prevents and resolves homelessness[19]. It also minimises harms including re-offending[20], and helps stabilise[21] the wider housing market.

The projected net increase of 55,000 dwellings by the end of the decade is striking. Yet it pales alongside the estimate that 437,000 households[22] had an “unmet need” for social housing on census night in 2021. That unmet need means they were either homeless at the time, or very low-income renters in rental stress[23].

The revival of public investment in social housing this decade is a notable policy reversal. But greater action is needed.

Our report finds[24] we need clearer, more consistent rules for social housing providers and residents. These rules have remained neglected for decades.

More importantly, none of the current programs – state, territory or federal – come with committed funding beyond 2030. Australian governments need to extend recent investment into the next decade and beyond at similar, or expanded, levels.

The post-1990s history of social housing in Australia has seen gradual decline, punctuated by occasional bursts of activity, like the Rudd-era response to the global financial crisis of 2008.

For the future, we need assurance that stated government commitments are being met. That means starting to officially, transparently track social housing construction in more detail at a national level.

Thanks to Peter Mares[25] for his input into this story.

References

  1. ^ social (www.ahuri.edu.au)
  2. ^ Social housing (www.ahuri.edu.au)
  3. ^ new research (www.unsw.edu.au)
  4. ^ social homes (www.pc.gov.au)
  5. ^ our new research (www.unsw.edu.au)
  6. ^ replacing ageing public housing (link.springer.com)
  7. ^ Sydney (theconversation.com)
  8. ^ Melbourne (theconversation.com)
  9. ^ Housing Australia Future Fund (www.housingaustralia.gov.au)
  10. ^ affordable (www.ahuri.edu.au)
  11. ^ we found (www.unsw.edu.au)
  12. ^ announcing (www.premier.vic.gov.au)
  13. ^ Big Housing Build (www.homes.vic.gov.au)
  14. ^ followed suit (homelessnessaustralia.org.au)
  15. ^ projected national household growth (www.abs.gov.au)
  16. ^ OECD (www.oecd.org)
  17. ^ 7% (webfs.oecd.org)
  18. ^ a vital role (nhsac.gov.au)
  19. ^ prevents and resolves homelessness (doi.org)
  20. ^ re-offending (www.ahuri.edu.au)
  21. ^ stabilise (theconversation.com)
  22. ^ 437,000 households (www.unsw.edu.au)
  23. ^ rental stress (www.ahuri.edu.au)
  24. ^ Our report finds (www.unsw.edu.au)
  25. ^ Peter Mares (theconversation.com)

Read more https://theconversation.com/55-000-extra-social-housing-homes-are-being-built-but-a-new-study-shows-that-boom-still-falls-short-275925

The Quiet Decline Of Australian Customer Service

Australians are increasingly united by one unusual national conversation: customer service is becoming frustrati...

Times Magazine

The Human Supplement Craze Has Officially Gone to the Dogs (Literally)

Australians’ appetite for supplements is no longer limited to their own vitamin cabinets. New reta...

AI Guilt: It’s Real — But it is irrational

Artificial intelligence is rapidly becoming one of the most powerful tools ever made available to ...

Australians Are Keeping Their Cars Longer — And It’s Changing The Market

Australia’s car market is undergoing a subtle but important transformation. People are keeping th...

Streaming Fatigue: Australians Overwhelmed By Subscriptions

Streaming was once supposed to simplify entertainment. Instead, many Australians now feel overwhe...

Why Shopping Centres No Longer Feel Exciting

There was a time when going to the shopping centre felt like an event. Families spent entire Satu...

Harry And Meghan: Less Powerful As Royals, More Powerful As Content

For all the claims of “Harry and Meghan fatigue”, the world’s media still cannot stop talking abou...

The Times Features

Nationals move Bill to protect women. Sall Grover inter…

Matt Canavan  All good. Look, well, it's great to be here with my friend and colleague, Alison Pe...

The Human Supplement Craze Has Officially Gone to the D…

Australians’ appetite for supplements is no longer limited to their own vitamin cabinets. New reta...

The Teals: Can They Spoil Australia’s New Attraction to…

Australian politics is shifting again. For years, the dominant national contest revolved around L...

Property Paralysis: Buyers Hesitate As Australia’s Hous…

Australia’s property market may still be active, but beneath the auctions, listings and glossy rea...

The Return Of Practical Luxury: Buyers Want Quality Aga…

For years, consumer culture revolved around speed and abundance. Fast fashion.Fast furniture.Fast...

People Are Going Out Less — And Businesses Know It

Restaurants are full on some nights. Concerts still sell tickets. Sporting events attract crowds. ...

Why Shopping Centres No Longer Feel Exciting

There was a time when going to the shopping centre felt like an event. Families spent entire Satu...

The Liberal Party Faces Its Greatest Question Since Men…

When Robert Menzies founded the Liberal Party of Australia in the aftermath of World War II, Austr...

The Noise Around the 2026 Federal Budget Does Not Match…

Every time the government changes the rules around property investment, the same thing happens. Ph...